We have just released Turris OS 6.2.3 This is mainly a bugfix release - nothing really exciting, except of some bugs being fixed and your router being up to date and more secure.
Bug Fixes
Fixed reForis LAN page when fetching DHCPv6 lease returns an unexpected value
Fixed Syncthing dashboard entry design to be more in line with other entries
Fixed Turris 1.x rainbow config migration from Turris OS 5
Updates
Sentinel Proxy updated to 2.1.0
Knot Resolver updated to 5.6.0 (security update)
git updated to 2.34.6 (security update)
Linux kernel updated to 5.15.90 and 5.10.164
We appreciate any feedback regarding this release.
Previous changelogs in the docs mentioned 5.15.x kernel update for Turris 1.x, was that rolled back to 5.10.x?
Do I get it right that Turris 1.x was rolled back to 5.10.x kernel?
If so, it might be a good idea to mention that in the docs changelog linked above and new releases forum posts as well, not just bury it inside a single previous release forum post. I just spent unproductive 30 minutes searching for why my kernel was āstuckā on 5.10, almost firing off a support email
Just something like āLinux kernel updated to 5.15.90 and 5.10.164 (Turris 1.x only)ā would be much clearer and avoid any confusion.
EDIT: Found the post mentioning it. Sad eyes. Guess we Turris 1.x beggars canāt be choosers
Otherwise, 6.2.3 seems to work fine on my Bluey. Did a full medkit reinstall from scratch, since for some reason Bluey got stuck in some loop and I had to factory reset to the original 3.x OS, with the normal 3->5 update stalling, but the medkit way worked a charmā¦
My original unmodified crowdfunded Turris Omnia is not happy. Over the past three days itās been dropping WAN, LAN and/or WiFi. Web login would succeed, but then be unable to render any pages.
A manual reset (cycling power) restores temporary sanity.
My Omnia is configured with the defaults, with threat detection options enabled. The only thing Iāve added is a 256GB NTFS USB drive as a CIFS NAS.
My Omnia has been so reliable that Iāve completely forgotten all my router-fu, so my main plan is simply to await future updates.
I have simillar issue. Two times happen that some clients were disconnected from wifi and was not able to connect - some authorization issue. I had to reset Omnia. And yesterday, all clients were disconnected. And when I logged in to check logs, Iāve found that Omnia just restarted. I donāt know why.
Iād blame the threat detection. In my network it found zillions of errors and overloaded the system RAM (which can have various funny consequences). Try turning the threat detection off.
Turris OS 6.2 (donāt know the exact release) came with some fixes for the threat detection. One of them is fixing its inability to create Reforis notifications. So after being fixed, the threat detection plugin starts generating Reforis notifications for each identified threat. If your home network looks similar to mine, that means thousands of notifications per minute. This is a load for which reforis definitely hasnāt been built, so it ends up eating all RAM and triggering the OOM killer which kills random processes on the router.
I updated from 6.2.2 to 6.2.3 but the WAN interface does not come up any longer after the upgrade. I connect to the ISP with an SFP
(1G SFP Wideband BiDi LX 10 km, įµĖ£1310 / į“æĖ£1460-1580 nm, DDM, LC-Simplex, Singlemode).
The only workaround I found so far is to revert back to the snapshot prior the update, i.e. 6.2.2. After the reboot and running 6.2.2 the connectivity to the WAN still didnāt work at first, but could be reestablished by removing the SFP module and reinserting it again (without shutting down the router in between).
I tried once more to upgrade but was able to reproduce the issue, as well as the reverting procedure.
Do you have any hints what the issue might be and who this could be solved?
I also just updated from 5.3.11 to 6.2.3 and have the āsameā issue like @schoenbi
SFP WAN is not comming up, but if i remove and connect again the fiberwire, it suddenly recognizes a connection:
Feb 7 20:26:25 turris kernel: [ 9.865282] sfp sfp: Host maximum power 3.0W
Feb 7 20:26:25 turris kernel: [ 10.198065] sfp sfp: module TP-LINK TL-SM321B rev 1.1 sn 35702202030045 dc 170223
Feb 7 20:26:25 turris kernel: [ 10.207424] mvneta f1034000.ethernet eth2: switched to inband/1000base-x link mode
Feb 7 20:26:25 turris kernel: [ 15.043825] mvneta f1034000.ethernet eth2: configuring for inband/1000base-x link mode
<<<<<< disconnect wire and reattach >>>>>>>
Feb 7 20:32:26 turris kernel: [ 385.706015] mvneta f1034000.ethernet eth2: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
Feb 7 20:32:26 turris kernel: [ 385.714091] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2: link becomes ready
Feb 7 19:32:26 turris netifd: Network device 'eth2' link is up
Feb 7 19:32:26 turris netifd: Interface 'wan' has link connectivity
Feb 7 19:32:26 turris netifd: Interface 'wan' is setting up now
Feb 7 19:32:26 turris netifd: wan (8774): udhcpc: started, v1.33.2
Feb 7 19:32:26 turris netifd: wan (8774): udhcpc: sending discover
Feb 7 19:32:28 turris netifd: wan (8774): udhcpc: sending discover
Feb 7 19:32:28 turris netifd: wan (8774): udhcpc: sending select for xxxxxxx
Feb 7 19:32:28 turris netifd: wan (8774): udhcpc: lease of xxxxxxxx obtained, lease time 4000
Feb 7 19:32:28 turris netifd: Interface 'wan6' is enabled
Feb 7 19:32:28 turris netifd: Network alias 'eth2' link is up
Feb 7 19:32:28 turris netifd: Interface 'wan6' has link connectivity
Feb 7 19:32:28 turris netifd: Interface 'wan6' is setting up now
Feb 7 19:32:28 turris netifd: Interface 'wan' is now up
Feb 7 19:32:28 turris firewall: Reloading firewall due to ifup of wan (eth2)
Feb 7 19:32:30 turris netifd: Interface 'wan6' is now up
Feb 7 20:32:30 turris dnsmasq-dhcp[5239]: read /etc/ethers - 0 addresses
I can remember in the early days there had been that SFP enable bug (set it as eth2ā¦), i canāt remember what had to be changed nor if that had to be in place still in 5.3.11. I found in 6.0.0 some comments about a SFP bugfix for 5.15. But i am just guessing here.
Any inputs?
I also created a ticket a week ago, but didnāt heard back anything yet. It is quite āthrillingā to know that network will not be back after an power outageā¦