Did someone have already figured out how to pull those not up-to-date containers?
I see only arm64 on the list. Also lets hope for the Turris Project they will continue to provide Turris builded armhf images. Also I hope also for unpriviledged ones.
Edit:
root@router:~# lxc-create --name test --bdev best --template download -- --dist deb
ian --release bookworm --arch armhf --server images.linuxcontainers.org
Downloading the image index
ERROR: Couldn't find a matching image
lxc-create: test: lxccontainer.c: create_run_template: 1627 Failed to create container from template
lxc-create: test: tools/lxc_create.c: main: 317 Failed to create container test
OK, then it is not different from windows server handling, thanks.
So the real message is we won’t get up-to-date images but those that need to be updated at the very beginning. Not that big of a deal in my eyes - just losing convenience…
yeah this what my OP was about - switch to https://repo.turris.cz/lxc/ and it should work (for debian latest is bullseye)
Not really - at least for about 2 years most of the popular images mirrored by turris team (debian, ubuntu, alpine) will work but afterwards it will become EOL then no more updates.
If turris team doesn’t step up with some plan maybe I’ll fork the lxc-ci and build some pipeline for newer images generation … in a couple months when my dayjob tasks will cool off
I won’t use Turris repo as I will not run priviledged containers. Maybe we could join forces (@maurer ) and provide community containers for Turris. I looked into lxc-ci and distrobuilder but just didn’t figure it out (yet!). And then maybe at some point Turris team will take over. I am an optimist about that.
why would the turris images be any different from the ones in linuxcontainers ? As for joining forces yes that would be great but as mentioned I currently don’t have any spare free time to work on this maybe in a 2-3 months
As developers don’t visit forum most of the time. Maybe people that use/want to use unprivileged containers should step in and leave a comment at GitLab that this functionality is crucial for the existence of TurrisOS anyway as described on every advertisement of the Turris devices (What @victor would probably add ).
TBH unprivileged containers are not that important for me personally - only tried it once - didn’t work then moved to privileged ones as it fits my need just fine - but that’s just me
If you use containers just for LAN stuff this is enough but I would like to provide services on WAN side and its a no way I am going to expose privileged container on the internets